Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Is it OK to use a single parenthesis after each number in a list?

+0
−0

Several times I've seen lists formatted like this:

My parenthetical pet peeves:
1) Referring to a single parenthesis as "a parenthesee" or something similarly beastly.
2) Smiley faces preceding closing parentheses. (How do you handle them? :))
3) Unmatched parentheses.

To me, it would make more sense to enclose the numbers in parentheses:

My parenthetical pet peeves:
(1) Referring to a single parenthesis as "a parenthesee" or something similarly beastly.
(2) Smiley faces preceding closing parentheses. (How do you handle them? :))
(3) Unmatched parentheses.

Or to use periods:

My parenthetical pet peeves:

1. Referring to a single parenthesis as "a parenthesee" or something similarly beastly.
2. Smiley faces preceding closing parentheses. (How do you handle them? :))
3. Unmatched parentheses.

I'm not the only one who is unsettled by unmatched parentheses. Is there authoritative sanction or condemnation of this method of formatting list numerals?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/5680. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

3 answers

+1
−0

If it is ok for your personal style (or specified company style) than yes, it is. Otherwise leave it.

As I have learned it in school (and I'm from Germany so it does not refer directly to English), periods were used for numbers, parentheses for letters:

  1. Point one is divided into the subpoints a), b) and c)
    a) This is a subitem
    b) This is the next
    c) (You will never figure out this one)

  2. Second topic

I could imagine that it started in English the same way and got mixed up during time (like it is in German). I see rarely a., b. and c. but it also happens. Again, a matter of personal style.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/5686. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

+1
−0

It is certainly very common to use a single parenthesis for an enumerated lists. For example, the Applied Geography Conferences Author Instructions say:

Where lists are used, each item should be numbered (with the number and a single parenthesis: 1) e.g.), with numbered items separated by double spacing.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/5682. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

+0
−0

Asking for a ruling on a point of style like this is generally pretty futile in English. There is no central authority. However, style manuals or internal style sheets can provide guidance, even though different ones will have varied answers.

Which answer you use depends on what document you're writing, and whether there's a style sheet that covers it. (Many corporations have internal style sheets.) If the document you're working on is to be published, one of the following general style guides (i.e., not an in-house, corporation- or publication-specific guide) may help:

  • The closest to a solid ruling on this that I found is in the Franklin Covey Style Guide for Business and Technical Communication. Vertical lists use bare numbers followed by periods, with sub-entries using letters in the same format. Inline lists use numbers/letters inside a pair of parentheses: (1), (a), and so on. (1997, pp.158-160)

  • APA style uses numbered lists without parentheses (see Quick Answers - Formatting lists and pairs of brackets in an inline list (see Lists, part 4):

    In running text, a series of items is designated by letters in parentheses: (a) first item, (b) second item, and (c) third item.

  • The Chicago Manual of Style uses mix of bare numbers and letters, as well as items enclosed by a pair of parentheses as well as a single parenthesis, leaving the exact execution up to the writer/editor. (16th edition, CMOS 6.126 Vertical lists with subdivided items (outlines) - that's a subscriber-only link, I'm afraid.)

  • The web-centric Yahoo! Style Manual, on the other hand, barely discusses numbered lists at all, assuming that lists on the web will generally be bulleted. However, the entry on lists does have an example of an inline list (embedded in the text of a paragraph) with opening and closing parentheses.

  • I also consulted The Economist Style Guide, which uses no special formatting for lists (and doesn't even put a period after the numbers in a vertical list). The Copyeditor's Handbook is also silent on the issue.

If you're writing for internal or informal documents (emails or such), just pick a method that appeals to you and stick with it. Personally, I prefer using single brackets in vertical lists and double brackets in inline text, since you're reading up to them; but that's just a personal preference.

And one last thing: Smiley faces at the end of a parenthetical sentence will be awkward no matter how you handle them. I suggest rewriting to avoid this.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »