Is the statement readable [closed]
Closed by System on Nov 14, 2012 at 12:56
This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.
This is not a proof reading request, I would just like to know whether the statements are readable or at least correct in structure before I would submit it.
"Prescriptions hold no metaphysical substance to identify a man being a sinner. It does not exist as the truth of nature, but only the failure to do what is prescribed. What is normative does not give any account for inherency, truth, or permanency to nature. Such language indicating pure value as goodness and evil cannot be tested. Goodness and evil can exist only objectively and not prescriptively. So for goodness and evil to exist it requires not to be reminded to be done, because he is already observing such."
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/6653. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
1 answer
I concur with Dale; this is so disjointed as to be incoherent. The paragraph needs some context and your sentences need to be simpler and more straightforward.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads