What symbols are used after difficult words in a text to refer a reader to a glossary for a definition?
What symbols used after difficult words in a text to refer a reader to a glossary for a definition?
I'm really looking for the most commonly used / accepted symbols and I am wondering whether certain symbols are specific only to particular subjects such as math / literature etc.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/8962. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
3 answers
You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.
Usually, there are no demarcations made in the text that would tell your readers if a word is present in the glossary or not.
In cases when there is a remark about something that needs to be made, a footnote is used.
In certain cases, the footnote is not explained in the footer of the same page, rather it refers to a different section usually titled "Notes".
-
For such footer symbols, the following convention is used:
If you want to explain footer at the end of the same page, start with asterisk (*) mark. If there are more than one such words on the same page, go ahead in the following order:
* , ** , *** , **** , † , ‡ , §.If you are using a "Notes" section, then you can use any symbol (preferably from the above defined list) to mark your words
In textbooks and articles, if words are to be included in a glossary (as is your question), there is no standard rule of using symbols. It is expected of the reader to have a look for and at the glossary, for words that they may find difficult.
As a suggestion you could italicize the first occurrence of words that you have included in the glossary
As an alternate, you can put an * mark next to the words (though this might distract your reader).
Another possible solution is to include a mark in a bracket. For example you could write (G) in the bracket (similar to Clayton's comment)
Hope this helps.
Addition: You can find the details about footnotes that I have referred to above at this link: http://dd.dgacm.org/editorialmanual/ed-guidelines/footnotes/footnotes_chap_09.htm
I have taken the info about the order of symbols to be used in the footnote from the above (which happens to be a chapter from "United Nations Editorial Manual").
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/9019. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
I used footnotes in my book (which is in English with Maltese words used occasionally throughout). Word provides footnotes with ease. You can also make a glossary automatically.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/8998. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
If you can live with it not being after the word, my dead-trees encyclopedia which was written long before web 2.0 was all the hype uses something like the form ►someword (that's U+25BA from the Geometric Shapes Unicode block; Black right-pointing pointer) to refer specifically to other subjects found in the encyclopedia. I can't cite any real facts to support the following, but it seems to be a fairly common notation in such works.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads