Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Order of references

+1
−0

Suppose I have the following references to literature:

  • Miller, H. (1999): … Referred to as: Miller (1999)
  • Miller, F., & Smith, J. (2002): … Referred to as: Miller & Smith (2002)
  • Miller, A., & Smith, J. (2003): … Referred to as: Miller & Smith (2003)
  • Miller, B., Smith, J., & Jones, K. (2001): … Referred to as: Miller et al. (2001)
  • Miller, B., Jones, K., & Smith, J. (2004): … Referred to as: Miller et al. (2004)

How to sort those entries?

“Logic” (?) says to first use

  • Miller, A., & Smith, J. (2003): … Referred to as: Miller & Smith (2003)

because all authors are “Millers” but Arthur’s given name begins with the first letter of the alphabet.

  • Miller, B., Jones, K., & Smith, J. (2004): … Referred to as: Miller et al. (2004)

would follow, because “B” comes after “A” and “Jones” before “Smith”,

  • Miller, B., Smith, J., & Jones, K. (2001): … Referred to as: Miller et al. (2001)
  • Miller, F., & Smith, J. (2002): … Referred to as: Miller & Smith (2002)

and

  • Miller, H. (1999): … Referred to as: Miller (1999)

would follow.

On the other hand, practically would sort as follows:

  • Miller, H. (1999): … Referred to as: Miller (1999)

because this is a “one author reference”.

  • Miller, F., & Smith, J. (2002): … Referred to as: Miller & Smith (2002)

Before

  • Miller, A., & Smith, J. (2003): … Referred to as: Miller & Smith (2003)

Because these are two-author references and “Miller & Smith (2002)” is chronologically before “Miller & Smith (2003)”. From the reference “Miller & Smith” the given names are not known to the reader (before looking in the references), thus sorting after the known year would make sense. Therefore also

  • Miller, B., Smith, J., & Jones, K. (2001): … Referred to as: Miller et al. (2001)

would go before

  • Miller, B., Jones, K., & Smith, J. (2004): … Referred to as: Miller et al. (2004)

Which sorting order is “better”/more common? Or is there another sort of ordering which makes more sense?!

There is no style guide, required format, standard or something like that for the planned publication.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/9260. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

You haven't mentioned the style guide you're following; different guides have different rules.

For Turabian / Chicago Style, the rules applicable are:

A single-author entry precedes a multiauthor entry beginning with the same name.

and

Successive entries by two or more authors in which only the first author’s name is the same are alphabetized according to the coauthors’ last names (regardless of how many coauthors there are).

These rules order your list; since every entry has a different set of authors, chronology doesn't come into it. The order you want (if you are following Chicago style) is:

Miller, H. (1999): … Referred to as: Miller (1999)
Miller, A., & Smith, J. (2003): … Referred to as: Miller & Smith (2003)
Miller, B., Jones, K., & Smith, J. (2004): … Referred to as: Miller et al. (2004)
Miller, B., Smith, J., & Jones, K. (2001): … Referred to as: Miller et al. (2001)
Miller, F., & Smith, J. (2002): … Referred to as: Miller & Smith (2002)
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »