Is it okay to mention a person's nationality and accent only once or twice in a story?
For example, if you have a guy who is an Indian (from India), and you say something like,
Sukant answered in his Northern Bhojpuri accent, "Yes. It is indeed true. Many people come into my store but not everyone for buying something."
Now later in the story, do I have to write things that "sound" Indian. You know, I don't have to make them somehow sound like the Indian guy in The Simpsons. I figure that as long as I subtly mention it a few times in the story, the reader will supply it naturally. Maybe I can use some idioms from his hometown, if it is important to the story, but other than that I don't know.
Say like a guy was from the South (like Alabama). Does he really have to say "y'all all the time"? "Howdy"? "Fixin'"?
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/9755. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
2 answers
You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.
I can think of at least two ways to demonstrate your character's nationality and accent without having to mention it constantly or write the dialogue crazily:
1) There is a difference between accent and dialect.
Accent is more or less the generally recognized version of the language, taught in textbooks, but with regional flavor to pronunciation. Maybe there's a lilt to the voice, or a drawl, or the Gs get dropped, or Rs added.
Dialect is when vocabulary and grammar change along with accent.
Examples:
Accent: "I'm gonna do something about that."
Dialect: "I'm fixin' to do somethin' 'bout that."
Accent: "Maybe something could happen."
Dialect: "Somethin' might could happen."
Accent: "Should I call you in the morning?"
Dialect: "Shall I knock you up in the morning, then?"
Dialect: "You want I should come call f'you tomorrow morning?"
The upshot is that you want enough differences from General American/English Speech to indicate that your speaker is of Indian descent speaking English as a second language, but not so much that it's impossible to read his dialogue written down.
2) When someone is learning English (or whatever) as second language, the speaker will often use the grammar of the native language, because s/he is still translating.
Example:
Native speaker: "My hair is so straight."
Native Italian, English ESL: "It's so straight, my hair."
0 comment threads
I'm reading a Spanish book and there is an Argentinean guy in the story.
The writer says it once or twice at the beginning and after that he just simulates the oral accent. He uses typical idioms or words like, for example, "carro" instead of "coche" when they say "car". They also put the accent in different syllables in some words (this is easier for a Spanish writer, since we can use graphic accent to mark it; he uses italics if the word is wrong written because of this).
Sometimes, the use of stereotypes can be useful, for example the people from Argentina are known as good psychologists.
Now when I read it, I imagine him talking with Argentinean accent and I don't need the author to remind me anymore.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/9757. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads