Character development in a story?
I am working on a book for fun and have thought a lot about character development. Is character development as important as the actual dialog of the story?
For example, I was reading a book this weekend that was written by one of the biggest legal thriller writers at the moment. The main character is in prison and then at the end moves to some place in South America and finds himself wealthy.
I thought that the story was good and the characters seem well described. But is the character development of the person needed before the story really gets going? Should the first chapters develop the character in the mind of the reader or can it build and add new items through the course of the story?
I have heard people say that some authors spend too much time describing a character or a scene and not enough on dialog. To me I like a good story but I had an English teacher tell me that you have to have the character developed in the beginning of the story rather than develop them throughout the course of the book.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/10131. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
3 answers
I, as a reader, cannot really know what a character is like until I see that character tested. Any clod can say “I love you”, but what if the beloved replies “If you really loved me, you’d kill my ex-husband”?
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/10154. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
I like reading stories where the characters are given an initial run-down as they are introduced into the story.
The run-down could roast the character in sarcasm, describing what others say and had said about the character, or praise him/her, would include their hitherto history and known accomplishment, rumours and hearsay.
I classify the contents of a run-down into
The author's personal description about the character/personality of the character. (Character of the character? Silly, but how else could I say it?)
The author's revelation about the thought history, desires and disappointments of the character that only the author would have known.
-
The character's known history
- known by general public
- known by a select few
- known by a partner
-
History of chatter, opinions, roasts, allegations found in item 3 concerning the character, but written without direct opinion from the author about the character.
- General public chatter
- Excerpts of chatter within family, colleagues, nemeses, small unknown parties
- Past interactions with spouse, children, close friends, nemesis.
The run-down is lightened up and made entertaining with roasts and sarcasm. A run-down is written as an intriguing short story within the story. I am not saying the run-down is compartmentalized into the four categories. Rather, the run-down relies on those four categories written as a short story.
But as the story proceeds, the actual character of those persons would take twists and turns, that would prove the initial run-down as wrong, inadequate or vindicated, besides the changes in the personality and experiences of the character.
I remember reading Dune. I remember the doctor who betrayed Duke Leto Atreides. However, I also recall observing Frank Herbert's writing of the series having become darker and relying more on author's personal perception in the initial run-down of a character, after the death of his wife. I think when an author becomes lazy making the initial run-down an op-ed piece rather than an intriguing short-story - that ruins the whole story.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/10150. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
You should establish the character early on, but I don't think you can develop anyone all in the beginning. What point is there for the story, then, if the character is done developing?
The reader should have some sense of who the person is before the real meat of the tale gets underway. Revealing parts of the character as you go is part of the point of a story.
I think either you misunderstood your teacher or the teacher was flat-out wrong.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads