Activity for Lundinâ€
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #286107 |
I checked through the help files but I failed to find any post describing the scope of this site and what's on-topic/off-topic. Analysing existing written fiction seems like something that should be addressed, particularly if it means analysing the content and writing style. (Which sounds like a huge... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284237 |
You will almost certainly not find any online sources that are better than simply reading well-written prose by established authors. Analyse it if you will - find some part that you like a lot, then ponder why the author wrote it the way they did. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281356 |
The ulterior motive here might not be to make a much profit on the actual novellas, but to make you interested in certain authors by offering you a 'sample' of their work. If you peek closer at the various authors in novella collections, you'll probably find out that most of them work with the very s... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281320 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: How do I brainstorm for writing positively about myself? > Tell us why you would be a good leader Typical interview question, they are hoping that you will say certain things they are looking for... but what those are will be different from case to case. So instead of trying to guess what they want to hear, just tell them what you are good at. Basica... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276282 |
Isn't the point rather that it _should_ be hard to read? This increases the reader's immersion, as they can easier picture how other characters listening may struggle to understand the accent. Many professional fiction authors type out accents just as you do here. In case some particular part turns a... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280757 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Does DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) Apply to Documentation? I would say that most of the time it does not apply. Suppose you are to document the use of one particular function. Good source code documentation instantly tells the user how to use that one function. Now suppose a nearly identical function with nearly identical use exists. Bad documentatio... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279079 |
Also these manuals were very well-written and easy to understand even for rookies, from what I remember. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278979 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Syntax summaries use brackets for optional elements; how do I represent literal brackets in a way readers will understand? Official ISO programming standards that describe programming language syntax etc often use opt to mark an argument as optional (with "OPT" in italics). So I would propose to write > ARRAY[data-type, countopt] This has the advantage that the abbreviation "OPT" is kind of self-explanatory and you... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |