Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Is there any research about the efficacy of illustration and example placement in procedure writing?

+1
−0

In writing procedural documentation, I have the choice of writing the complete step-by-step instructions with references to an appendix of illustrations,

For instance:

1. Do task 1 (see Fig. 1)
2. Do task 2 (see Fig. 2)

Illustrations
-------------
+-------+
| Fig 1 |
+-------+
+-------+
| Fig 2 |
+-------+

or to accompany each step with an illustration, almost as if the steps were the captions to the illustrations,

For instance:

+-------+
| Fig 1 |
+-------+
1. Do Task 1.

+-------+
| Fig 2 |
+-------+
2. Do Task 2.

Is there any research to show which method is more effective for the person attempting to learn the material? What are some of the considerations I need to make in choosing one method over the other?

If it makes any difference, each document is 10-15 pages long, about 25% of which is text and 75% is illustration.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/16015. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »