Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Creating Slogans/Rallying Cries

+0
−0

The culture I have created needs some unifying phrases but I'm having trouble thinking of some that spur emotion but do not sound silly or too technical.

Are there there any techniques for generating catchy rallying cries, slogans, or chants?

Surely with propaganda and social control in today's world there is some good information out there. I can't seem to find anything not related to advertising... They mostly tend to say the slogan should differentiate the product by highlighting it's strengths.

I'm thinking about differentiating by referencing the religion but that leads me to something like: "For Tyr's blessing!" While I'm looking for something not so generic like: "Odin owns you all!" My ideas are lacking in the inspirational factor.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/24434. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

2 answers

You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.

+0
−0

Most slogans and rallying cries are banal in themselves. Terri's example of "Remember the Alamo" is a case in point. Unless you do remember the Alamo, and unless you care about what happened there, it might as well be "Remember Schenectady".

Slogans and rallying cries work by invoking stories that the hearer cares about. If you don't know the story, or care about it, then the slogan will sound silly, no matter what it is.

So, you need to tell the story, make the reader care, and then create the rallying cry.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+1
−0

A lot of slogans (and this goes for advertising as well as politics, since slogans are a sort of political advertisement after all) follow one of the following patterns:

Three words are optimal in many languages. This was quite explicitly stated by Nazi propagandists (Goebbels made it an explicit rule), but has also been found whether consciously or unconsciously by propagandists of all ideologies:

Bomben auf Engeland!

Dieu le veut!

Вся власть – Советам!

Black is Beautiful!

Drill, baby, drill!

Éirinn go Brách!

Alba gu bràth!

Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité!

Tiocfaidh ár lá!

It's interesting in a way that those of the above which aren't English but which remain in three words in translation ("Bombs on England", "God wills it", and "Liberty, Equality, Brotherhood") retain the most force while those that don't ("All power to the Soviets", "Ireland forever", "Scotland forever", "Our day will come") lose some of their impact. Indeed, Dieu le veut was first found as the Latin Deus vult, but the French packs more of a punch.

They are easily chanted, work well typographically, and are a microscopic example of the Rule of Three, and just long enough to convey an idea without being long enough to encourage people to think about it too much.

Longer slogans tend to turn on a conjunction or a copula between two roughly equal-length parts:

Come and take it!

Give me liberty or give me death!

Each for all and all for each!

The personal is political!

The rich get richer and the poor get poorer!

Vivre Libre ou Mourir!

Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve! (comma rather than conjunction, but similar pattern)

In visual use, instead of a copula there could even be an equal sign, as in the ACT UP slogan:

Silence = Death

Anything longer, if spoken, than that will generally rhyme and have a balanced rhythm:

Keep your rosaries / Of our ovaries.

We are gay, we are straight / It's the bigots that we hate.

Hey, hey, LBJ! / How many kids did you kill today?

One, two, three, four / We don't want your bloody war!

One, two, three, four / Fuck the rich, feed the poor!

Six, seven, nine, four, seven, double-oh / A woman has the right to know.

Vårat svar på monarkin / gör som Frankrike, giljotin!

These last though are more appropriate for several rounds of repetition.

Anything longer than that or without a rhyme, tends to work better on a placard than spoken, and then things are a lot looser. Snappiness and two-part balance still often feature.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/24530. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »