The use of short, concise sentences to suggest a withdrawn character
I'm a beginner writer. I have been focusing recently on giving my characters depth. Making them complex people with complex emotions and motivations.
One of my characters is depressed. She's going through a tough time and is feeling pretty numb and disenchanted with the world. I write in the first person from her point of view, and I have found myself writing very short, concise sentences when she is depressed and longer, more descriptive, flowier emotional ones when she relaxes.
For example, a party she went to that she didn't want to be at: "I smiled. I ate. I spoke. I listened. I left."
Now naturally, the entire book isn't like this. The rest does flow, however there are situations where I feel like it's appropriate.
I like the complete lack of feeling, devoid of description or emotion, just like how she is numb.
That said, I have a couple of concerns about this technique.
- it may be jarring to the reader. It can be awkward, uncomfortable to read.
- I feel like I may be missing out on opportunities to elaborate and develop her more. I could be using these times as a chance to say a bit more about how she feels.
- I read on another answer that writing should flow like speaking does, and this goes against that.
I don't know if this kind of thing is done. Maybe my writing immaturity is showing here. Is this technique used by writers, or is it generally considered a bad idea in general to write sentences purposely devoid of detail? Is this something I should put aside until I'm more experienced and know better how to break the rules?
I like this idea. I was actually planning to use a similar technique in one of my own stories at once point. To address …
6y ago
> "I smiled. I ate. I spoke. I listened. I left." If you are going to write from a depressed point of view, I don't thi …
6y ago
I think it is unwise to rely on style changes to delineate a character. First, it is far from certain that the reader wi …
6y ago
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/29897. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
3 answers
You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.
I think it is unwise to rely on style changes to delineate a character. First, it is far from certain that the reader will notice the difference, or interpret it in the way you intend. Don't rely on subtle effects to get across key points of your story. It is hard to do well and probably will go over most reader's heads. By all means use style cues to reinforce the character portrait that you create by other methods, but don't rely on it.
You should also consider that while you start from knowing who the character is and look for ways to express that, the reader starts from not knowing who they are and trying to figure it out from the clues available. What seems to you to suggest the character you are thinking of may suggest a very different character to the reader. For instance, short clipped sentences might suggest a military background or lack of intelligence.
Characters are defined by their values and their actions and ultimately is it what you show or tell about their values and their actions that will shape the reader's view of them. Better to focus on portraying those things using conventional writing techniques than to try to encode information in your style choices.
0 comment threads
"I smiled. I ate. I spoke. I listened. I left."
If you are going to write from a depressed point of view, I don't think these are the thoughts of a depressed person.
For a depressed person, these are lies. They do not necessarily lie to themselves.
A more convincing internal dialogue is what they are really thinking. Depression is largely playing a negativity game, that you cannot help but play. Nothing matters. Everything is shit. Life has no meaning and there is nothing to really look forward to --- except disappointing yourself and others and ruining everything.
You can show that; I have an example off the top of my head. (consider it an illustration only; you have to get into the mindset for your character and write in your own voice.)
Example:
I hung up, and put down the phone without looking. It slipped off the table and crashed on the floor. It's probably broken, there goes four hundred dollars. I don't have the energy to pick it up and check. What difference would it make anyway? If it's broken, it's broken.
I have to go to this stupid party. That means I have to shower. That means I have to get out of this chair. I sat for another two minutes hoping some brilliant excuse would come to me, but my mind is a blank. Plus I'd need my phone to make it, and it's probably broken.
I leveraged myself out of the chair, and retrieved my phone. It wasn't broken. Too bad, I hate this phone.
After my shower, I can't stand the idea of having to pick out clothes. I stand before the mirror naked. Getting fat. Getting wrinkled. Dying more every day, like every other animal on this planet. I tried to fake a smile, for the party. Awful. Try again. Still awful, I look like a corpse.
I steel myself for the torture of selecting an outfit, and think to myself, "You know the drill. Pretend to smile, pretend to eat, pretend to listen, pretend you have a big day tomorrow and escape."
0 comment threads
I like this idea. I was actually planning to use a similar technique in one of my own stories at once point. To address the bullet points in your question:
It may be jarring to the reader. It can be awkward, uncomfortable to read.
In this instance, I think that's a good thing. The character herself is feeling awkward and uncomfortable and you are accurately conveying that feeling to the audience.
I feel like I may be missing out on opportunities to elaborate and develop her more. I could be using these times as a chance to say a bit more about how she feels.
Perhaps. But you also state, elsewhere in the question, that "how she feels" at that precise moment is numb. In other words, she isn't feeling anything, ergo, there's not much to elaborate upon in that regard. Instead, wait until after she's left the party and she's relaxed a little, and then have her reflect on the party, her feelings about it, and anything else you feel needs elaborating.
I read on another answer that writing should flow like speaking does, and this goes against that.
See my first point. In this instance, the character's thoughts are clearly not flowing properly, and your writing conveys that.
It's a good technique, but I would advise you not to overuse it. Since her description during these scenes is deliberately sparse, they should be fairly short by nature, so what you should end up with is long periods of quiet introspection and lucidity punctuated by short, sudden bursts of numbness and dissociation.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads