Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Making similies and metaphors work as intended [closed]

+0
−0

Closed by System‭ on Jun 27, 2018 at 14:16

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

Similies are like the Reddit 50/50 challenge: you either get something very good, or your eyes will melt off. I mean, you can ruin the mood with a bad one and make yourself a laughing stock. Metaphors are more, well:

Simile: "Oh come on, his heart is soft like a plush toy, I don't want to make him feel bad."
Metaphor: "Oh come on, he's such a plushie heart, I don't want to make him feel bad."

In both cases, the key is somewhere in the analogy, if that's shoddy you fail. What I can't figure out is what makes an analogy shoddy when it's (scientifically speaking) accurate.

How to know if my analogy is as weak as my will to live?


Note: I won't commit suicide, that goes against my programming.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/37259. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

Similes are like the Reddit 50/50 challenge: you either get something very good, or your eyes will melt off.

This is an example of the second variety. ;)

Several things need to be true of a simile in order for it to have a chance:

  • The two things in question need to actually be similar in the way you say they are. Not sometimes, but always. You can't compare something to grapes, but only the sweet green ones that ripen in July, but you took them off the branch a few days too early.
  • The object you're comparing to needs to be sufficiently well known. In the example above, I have no idea what the Reddit 50/50 challenge is.
  • The characteristic in question needs to be a known characteristic of the object in question, and a characteristic commonly associated with it.
  • The comparison shouldn't be exaggerated. Reddit doesn't make your eyes melt off. My love for ice-cream is not deeper than the deepest ocean.
  • It shouldn't be trite. "Skin white as snow" for example has been used to a point that it is only acceptable for Snow White now.

In the end, however, your best indicator, if you're unsure, is reaction of beta readers. Some would even be able to explain why a specific simile doesn't work, even though you've done everything "by the book".

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads