Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

MLA: Indirect Citation without quote

+0
−0

I have a text which I would like to quote. However, the particular section of the text in which I am interested cites but does not directly quote another author. Do I need an indirect citation, and if so what form would that take?

For example: I want to quote the following out of Jones' paper:

Students are found to become more politically active in college (Smith).

Do I cite it as:

A) "Students are found to become more politically active in college" (Jones).

B) "Students are found to become more politically active in college" (Smith qtd. in Jones).

C) Something else entirely?

A similar question was asked here, but the last part was never answered: MLA: citing indirect sources w/o quoting

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/43383. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+1
−0

C.

You need to find the text the author is citing and cite it directly.

If the actual statement is as vague as your example (I realize you may simply be using a generic example as a placeholder), you'll want to expand on it as well. It's not enough to state the general result of a study. You need to define your terms and explain it. This means finding the original.

You can do an indirect cite only in cases where the original is impossible to find or where the original is a document only the author who cited it could have access to (a personal letter or email, for example).

This gives you a citation that might look like this:

In a 2013 study of American higher education, students were twice as likely to volunteer for a political campaign in college as they were in high school. (Full Smith cite)

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »