Bullets vs. Numbering: which to use when?
A writer can either choose to use bullets or else stick to conventional (or in certain cases non-conventional) numbering. Are there set guidelines about when to use what? Is the use of numbering preferred over bullets in more professional settings (example, academic writing, technical reports, theses, etc.) or is it left to the choice of the writer?
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/10437. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
1 answer
In everyday writing, (say on the web, or an email) I'd use bullets where possible. I think they're more accessible and quicker to scan. Unless there were some reason to actually number things. The Wikipedia style manual spells this out well:
Use numbers rather than bullets only if:
- A need to refer to the elements by number may arise;
- The sequence of the items is critical; or
- The numbering has some independent meaning, for example in a listing of musical tracks.
In academic or tech writing, the governing style sheets or style guides (MLA, APA, etc.) should always be consulted. I'll leave it to our resident tech writers to provide more detail, but I'd consult those resources and only then use the logic above: Use my own preference for bullet points unless there's a reason not to.
It's worth noting that style guides all have specific requirements for how lists are used and formatted. APA at least seems to boil down to similar but more detailed advice as the wikipedia style guide; i.e., have a good reason for using the format you employ.
- APA on numbered lists, bulleted lists
- MLA on seriation (conventional lists and in-paragraph lists) (Note that MLA style seems to prohibit use of bulleted lists.)
0 comment threads
0 comment threads