Activity for Monica Cellio
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #275926 | Post edited | — | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #39392 | Post edited | — | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #39392 | Post edited | — | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #275926 | Post edited | — | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #275926 | Post edited | — | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #275926 | Post edited | — | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #275895 | Initial revision | — | over 6 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Would content at ebooks.se be in scope here? This answer is my opinion, not moderator/admin edict. Voting and feedback in comments still apply. Their site description says the site is for publishers and readers of ebooks. Anything about publishing ebooks is on-topic here (and was on Writing.SE). Reading is probably not unless it's stuf... (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275876 |
Oh, that's bold? It's a small-enough difference that, on its own, I didn't realize. Thanks. (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275876 |
Nice! Did you mean for the first line to also be inside the blockquote? Or is it a title and not part of the poem itself? (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #275819 |
Post edited: |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275819 |
Confirmed. It happens if you use the controls, but not if you type markdown (which is what I tried first, before realizing what you meant). (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Comment | Post #75027 |
@aCVn agreed on all points, including using sparingly. (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #75027 | Initial revision | — | over 6 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Are speaker tags always necessary when multiple people are in the conversation? Sometimes it doesn't matter who said what. In your example, where everyone has the same goals and is working together, it seems fine to leave most or all of them out -- the focus here is more on the group discussion than on individual speakers. This approach wouldn't work in cases where the spe... (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Comment | Post #75003 |
Good point about burying the original content, which we need more of (and to be more findable). And we should continue to prune stuff from the original import that is not helping us -- downvotes and flags are helpful there. (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74997 | Initial revision | — | over 6 years ago |
| Question | — |
What new data should we import from SE? When we set up this site we imported from SE as of the December data dump (the latest we had at the time). We didn't have a way to get the delta; the import code didn't use the API. We now have better data-import tools, and there's been a new data dump. We can, therefore, import stuff that w... (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74979 |
@Canina agreed. The goal is to design with both in mind. In fact, most developers are using desktop, so we have to actively think about mobile -- but we want to do that *early*, not *later*. (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74979 | Initial revision | — | over 6 years ago |
| Question | — |
mice don't tap and tablet-users don't click: what word can I use for all audiences instead? I am documenting features on a web site. The audience is end users, who could be anywhere from seasoned Internet veterans to relatively new people who came for my site's content but aren't generally online for hours every day. People visit the web site on a variety of devices, from phones (mobi... (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74968 |
Post edited: |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #7990 |
Post edited: trying to fix formatting of superscripts |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #10769 |
Post edited: I've since had the direct personal experience, so don't need this disclaimer now. |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74968 | Initial revision | — | over 6 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: How can I make a transition from third person omniscient to first person less jarring for the reader? Like this answer, I don't think you need to use first-person to get into a character's head. I want to focus a little more on how to do that in omniscient third-person. An omniscient narrator can get into any character's head, as you said. You want to switch to first-person, maybe to focus (... (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74906 |
@aCVn yes, it's the aggregation that makes the idea attractive to me. You can see at a glance what the overall reaction is, and if you want to read the comments you might learn more but you don't have to. (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74958 |
Other things that can cause activity are edits and closing/reopening. But yes, there's a bug here and we're trying to characterize it. Sometimes it's right and sometimes it's not. (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74906 |
@Mark that's an idea worth exploring. Better to not count them and then decide to (if it's compatible with how they're being used) than do it and then take it away (which could frustrate people). Once we get there at all, I could see experimenting with ways to use that data. Since it would alr... (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74906 | Initial revision | — | over 6 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Accepted Answer? We need to flesh this out, but the idea I have in my head, and that I recall discussing on the forum thread (which I haven't gone back and reread yet), is that in addition to votes we'll allow people to add reactions like "this worked" (and maybe a few others TBD). These would be public, unlike v... (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74875 |
Post edited: |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74886 | Initial revision | — | over 6 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Sequence of Categories This is now configurable and I've moved Meta to the last position on this site. (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74877 |
This is a question about the site, not about writing, so we've moved it to Meta. (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74885 | Initial revision | — | over 6 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Naming of Categories "Questions" seems better than "Q&A", yes. Not everything on the site will be questions. For example, a site can have a blog or a set of resources. Some sites will have sandboxes, which are proto-questions but not questions anybody should be answering yet. (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #38585 |
Post edited: updated link |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74876 |
Obligatory reminder: I'm a *technical* writer; creative writing is more of a stretch for me, unlike most folks here. :-) (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74876 | Initial revision | — | over 6 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Writing challenge #1: The great outdoors! She traced the delicate lines beneath the green leaf. The new growth felt fragile but tenacious, breaking free of winter's grasp, just like her. Winter? How did she know about winter? Ancestral memory, she guessed; seasons were new to her. She breathed in the scent of buds just opened into... (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74875 |
Issue created: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/73 (a priority or sequence number is what I suggested too). (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74875 |
Ooh yes, we want the sequence to be controllable somehow. (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74857 | Initial revision | — | over 6 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Let's restart writing challenges! Mithical has posted the first challenge: the great outdoors! Please join us there. I hope this'll be the first of many. (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74846 | Initial revision | — | over 6 years ago |
| Question | — |
Let's restart writing challenges! The writing challenges we've done in the past were fun and helped us flex our muscles, especially if they nudged us into new types of writing. Let's bring those back! I have created the Challenges category here. I've set the default license to CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which in plain English means it... (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74843 |
I saw a question I wanted to answer, so I imported it here the old-fashioned way. This is an experiment. I don't plan to make a habit of this or anything, but it's in keeping with the license. If I could disassociate the question I would, sorry. (more) |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74844 |
Post edited: |
— | over 6 years ago |
| Edit | Post #74844 | Initial revision | — | over 6 years ago |